English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

To gain insight into the clinicopathologic profile of colorectal carcinomas harboring oncogenic NTRK fusions based on eastern populations as well as make the best testing algorithm for the screen, we use pan-Trk immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence  in situ  hybridization (FISH) respectively to screen NTRK fusions in a large, unselected cohort of 819 colon cancers; either IHC or FISH positive cases were further detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS). IHC staining was observed in ten (1.22%) cases. FISH positive was observed in 13 (1.59%) cases, and finally, a total of 18 cases were under both a DNA-based and an RNA-based NGS assay. RNA-based NGS was positive in 13 of 18 cases, whereas DNA-based NGS was only positive in three of 18 cases. In total 13 RNA-based NGS NTRK fusion-positive cases, only six cases were pan-TRK IHC positive  versus  12 were FISH positive. More important, in 13 RNA-based NGS cases only five cases contain the full length of NTRK tyrosine kinase (TK) domain and form the classical fusion chimeras, other six cases only maintain parts of the TK domain and form the sub-classical fusion chimeras, two cases totally miss the TK domain and form the non-classical fusions. For clinicopathologic characteristics, besides the MMR (mismatch repair) status (p = 0.001), there is no difference between the NTRK fusion-positive and negative cases. Nevertheless, classical fusion cases prefer low differentiation (p = 0.001) and different patterns of growth (p < 0.001). Besides, we found all five classical NTRK fusion cases, and only one sub-classical case was harboring MLH1/PMS2 deficiency. When combining FISH and MMR (Mismatch Repair) status, besides one sub-classical case, all five classical fusions were detected, which means MLH1/PMS2 expression could further narrow the classical fusions in FISH NTRK fusion positive cases. Given the low sensitivity and specificity of the pan-Trk antibody, it would be useless to use IHC to screen NTRK fusion-positive CRCs. Combining FISH and MLH1/PMS2 IHC would be a good testing algorithm for the screen effective NTRK fusions. Finally, if patients are going to undergo TRK-based targeted therapy, only RNA-based NGS for detection of the specific fusion could tell the precise rearrangement information.

MLH1/PMS2 Expression Could Tell Classical NTRK Fusion in Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Positive Colorectal Carcinomas