English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective  This study aimed to report the characteristic of tumor regrowth after gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and outcomes of repeat GKRS in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs).    Design and Methods  This retrospective study consisted of 369 NFPA patients treated with GKRS. The median age was 45.2 (range, 7.2–84.0) years. The median tumor volume was 3.5 (range, 0.1–44.3) cm 3 .    Results  Twenty-four patients (6.5%) were confirmed as regrowth after GKRS. The regrowth-free survivals were 100%, 98%, 97%, 86% and 77% at 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 year, respectively. In multivariate analysis, parasellar invasion and margin dose (<12 Gy) were associated with tumor regrowth (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.125, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.318–7.410, p = 0.010 and HR = 3.359, 95% CI = 1.347–8.379, p = 0.009, respectively). The median time of regrowth was 86.1 (range, 23.2–236.0) months. Previous surgery was associated with tumor regrowth out of field (p = 0.033). Twelve patients underwent repeat GKRS, including regrowth in (n = 8) and out of field (n = 4). Tumor shrunk in seven patients (58.3%), remained stable in one (8.3%) and regrowth in four (33.3%) with a median repeat GKRS margin dose of 12 (range, 10.0–14.0) Gy. The actuarial tumor control rates were 100%, 90%, 90%, 68%, and 68% at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years after repeat GKRS, respectively.    Conclusions  Parasellar invasion and tumor margin dose (<12 Gy) were independent risk factors for tumor regrowth after GKRS. Repeat GKRS might be effective on tumor control for selected patients. For regrowth in field due to relatively insufficient radiation dose, repeat GKRS might offer satisfactory tumor control. For regrowth out of field, preventing regrowth out of field was the key management. Sufficient target coverage and close follow-up might be helpful.

Characteristic of Tumor Regrowth After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery and Outcomes of Repeat Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas