English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Pat Amos documents the power of therhythmic moment in autism, connectsit to current thinking in developmentalpsychology, and draws practical lessonsfortherapeuticintervention.Onequestiontherapists in practice may struggle with isconvincing some parents and other pro-fessionals of the potential power of thesetypes ofinterventions. Asamovementandmusic therapist I recall a mother tellingme about her recent visit to a prominentpediatricneuropsychiatrist.Theneuropsy-chiatrist was once again recommending aregimen of heavy medication and behav-ioral therapy. The mother told her thatshe felt her son was making great progressthroughworkwithrhythmandmove-ment. “That won’t hold,” said the neu-ropsychiatrist.Will it hold? Can a movement basedintervention compete with a pharmaceu-tical one? The idea can meet with greatskepticism. However, there is a strongargument to be made from neurobiolog-ical theory that a rhythmic interventionholds the potential to be at least as pow-erful as a chemical intervention, and thebroaderone’sinvestigationintoneurobiol-ogy, the more the arguments for this viewaccumulate.

Neural connectivity, music, and movement: a response to Pat Amos