English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The field of error monitoring is one of the richest and fastest growing research areas within human neuroscience. In particular, applied researchers in clinical psychology and psychiatry are excited about the potential for this research to inform models and treatments of psychopathology. Neuroimaging techniques including event-related brain potential (ERP) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have highlighted the fascinating ways in which the brain detects and responds to errors and how these processes go awry in clinical populations. However, an increased focus on the brain activity itself has resulted in a neglect of behavioral performance, including the important adjustments that follow mistakes. Here, we suggest that the consideration of task performance and, in particular, post-error behavioral adjustments (PEBAs), substantially improves our understanding of the function of error-related brain activity. Critically, this entails controlling for behavioral differences and reporting multiple PEBAs, especially post-error accuracy. We urge researchers to consider the full range of behavior in order to foster a richer understanding of how individuals detect and bounce back from their mistakes.

Improving the study of error monitoring with consideration of behavioral performance measures