English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective  This study aimed to determine the ruptured rate and hemodynamic difference between wide-neck aneurysms (WNAs) and narrow-neck aneurysms (NNAs), as well as the hemodynamic parameters of risk factors for aneurysm rupture.    Methods  A total of 121 cases of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) were studied retrospectively between January 2019 and April 2021 at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. Intracranial aneurysms were classified into four types: ruptured wide-neck aneurysms (RWNAs), unruptured wide-neck aneurysms (UWNAs), ruptured narrow-neck aneurysms (RNNAs), and unruptured narrow-neck aneurysms (UNNAs). The Chi-square test was used to compare differences in rupture ratios. The clinical characteristics and hemodynamics were analyzed statistically to reveal the rupture risk factors. Moreover, significant parameters were subjected to binary logistic regression analysis to identify the independent predictive factors. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to obtain cutoff values.    Results  WNAs ruptured more frequently than NNAs ( P  = 0.033). Ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) were characterized by significantly higher intra-aneurysmal pressure (IAP), wall shear stress (WSS), wall shear stress gradient (WSSG), and lower normalized wall shear stress (NWSS) than unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). RWNAs had higher IAP, WSS, and lower NWSS than UWNAs ( P  &amp;lt; 0.05). RNNAs had higher IAP, Streamwise WSSG and lower NWSS compared to UNNAs ( P  &amp;lt; 0.05). Binary logistic regression revealed that IAP and WSS were independent predictive risk factors for WNAs rupture, with cut-off values of 405.5 and 6.66 Pa, respectively. Also, IAP was an independent predictive risk factor for NNA rupture, with a cut-off value of 255.3 Pa.    Conclusions  Wide-neck aneurysms and narrow-neck aneurysms have diverse hemodynamics, which prompts a higher rupture ratio for WNAs. IAP could characterize the rupture risk in both WNAs and NNAs independently, but WSS could only predict the rupture risk in WNAs. This research might assist neurosurgeons with fostering a more sensible strategy for the treatment of IAs.

Different Hemodynamic Characteristics and Resulting in Different Risks of Rupture Between Wide-Neck and Narrow-Neck Aneurysms