English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Aim  Accumulating evidence supports the use of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) type to classify different clinical entities. We aimed to evaluate whether the presence and type of ANCA determine different diseases, based on clinical phenotypes, renal involvement, and response to treatment.    Patients and Methods  Differences in terms of clinical manifestations, disease activity, laboratory parameters, and histology were recorded between patients with focal necrotizing glomerulonephritis (FNGN) due to myeloperoxidase (MPO-), proteinase 3-ANCA(+) [PR3-ANCA(+)], and ANCA(-) disease at time of diagnosis. Patients were treated with the same protocol and followed-up for 24 months, in a scheduled basis of every month for the first year and every 3 months for the second year. Primary end points were: (i) Combined end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and/or death and (ii) The presence of major or minor relapse during follow-up and secondary endpoint was the combination of ESRD and reduction of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 50%.    Results  A total of 92 patients (M/F 39/53, mean age 59.1 ± 15 years) diagnosed with FNGN due to ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), 36 (39.1%) patients diagnosed with PR3-ANCA, 39 (42.4%) patients diagnosed with MPO-ANCA, and 17 (18.5%) patients diagnosed with ANCA(-) were included. Number of involved systems differed significantly between PR3-, MPO-ANCA, and ANCA(-), with only renal involvement in 3, 25.5, and 29% of patients, two systems involved in 33, 31, and 59% of patients, and &amp;gt; 3 systems involved in 64, 43.5, and 12% of patients, respectively ( p  = 0.002). Histology classification revealed focal, crescentic, mixed, and sclerotic type in 14, 64, 19, and 3% of PR3-ANCA(+), 8, 28, 18, and 46% of MPO-ANCA, and 41, 29, 6, and 24% of ANCA(-), respectively ( p  &amp;lt; 0.0001). Primary end point of ESRD ± Death was reached in 11 (30.6%), 16 (41%), and 6 (35.5%) patients with PR3-ANCA(+), MPO-ANCA(+), and ANCA(-), respectively ( p  = NS); similarly, ESRD± &amp;gt; 50% eGFR reduction in 8 (22.2%), 15 (38.5%), and 5 (29.4%) patients, respectively ( p  = NS), meaning that patients with MPO-ANCA(+) showed a propensity to decline renal function. Rate of relapse was increased in the presence of patients with PR3-ANCA(+), 14 (38.9%), 4 (11.8%), and 2 (10.3%) of patients with PR3-ANCA(+), MPO-ANCA(+), and ANCA(-), had at least one relapse during the two-year follow-up ( p  = 0.006).    Conclusion  Clinical phenotype and renal histology differ significantly between PR3-ANCA(+), MPO-ANCA(+), and ANCA(-) disease and FNGN; however, renal function outcome is similar, despite the increased rate of relapses in patients with PR3-ANCA(+).

Different Types of ANCA Determine Different Clinical Phenotypes and Outcome in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (AAV)