English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Biological reference points (BRPs) derived from per-recruit analyses are commonly used in inferring stock status and serve as the target or threshold in fisheries management. However, the estimation of BRPs may be impacted by the variability in life history processes, and particularly, individual growth rates often display substantial seasonal oscillations but are seldomly considered in per-recruit analyses. Using four commercial fish species  Lophius litulon ,  Saurida elongata ,  Hexagrammos otakii , and  Larimichthys polyactis  in coastal China Seas as examples, this study examined the effects of seasonal growth variability on per-recruit analyses and on the estimation of BRPs. We developed an individual-based modeling framework to simulate growth patterns with and without variations at the seasonal and the individual levels and adopted two common assessment methods, age-based analysis and length-frequency analysis, to estimate growth parameters regarding data availability in data-rich or data-poor fisheries, respectively. We found that ignoring seasonality could lead to substantial errors in the estimation of BRPs for the small-size species  H. otakii  and  L. polyactis  in our evaluation; when seasonal growth was considered, the estimation could be largely improved. Length-frequency analysis might yield considerably less reliable estimations than age-based method. The time of year when fast growth occurs determines positive or negative bias in estimation, and the amplitude of seasonal growth determines the degree of biases. In general, ignoring the seasonality of growth when there is can lead to underestimated growth parameter  K  and trigger biases that propagate in stock assessment and management, whereas incorporating seasonality falsely in assessment when there is no seasonal variation will have little influences on the estimation of BRPs. This study contributes to demonstrate the risk of ignoring seasonality in stock assessment and the approaches accounting for seasonal variability in fishery management.

Accounting for Seasonal Growth in Per-Recruit Analyses: A Case Study of Four Commercial Fish in Coastal China Seas