English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background:  Anti-silencing function 1B (ASF1B), a histone H3-H4 chaperone, is crucial for S-phase progression and cell proliferation. Recent studies have shown that ASF1B may be used as a new proliferation marker for cancer prognosis. However, the prognostic value and effect of ASF1B on tumor cells and the immune microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear.   Methods:  We analyzed the expression of ASF1B and its prognostic value using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (as a training set) and other databases, and we validated the findings by immunohistochemistry in our clinical database, containing 141 HCC patients (as a validation set). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and gene set variation analysis (GSVA) were performed to probe the tumor-associated biological processes of ASF1B in HCC. The interrelationships between ASF1B expression and tumor immunological characteristics were analyzed by multiple databases. The Imvigor210 cohort was retrieved to assess the ability of ASF1B to predict immunotherapy efficacy.   Results:  ASF1B was highly expressed in tumor tissue compared to paracancerous tissue. High ASF1B expression was associated with worse overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the training set ( p  = 0.005,  p  &amp;lt; 0.001) and validation set ( p  &amp;lt; 0.001,  p  &amp;lt; 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that ASF1B was an independent prognostic factor associated with OS and PFS. GSEA and GSVA suggested that ASF1B was involved in tumor-associated biological processes, including the cell cycle, DNA replication, base excision repair, mismatch repair, RNA degradation, ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, and nucleotide excision repair. Further analysis revealed that the levels of ASF1B were positively correlated with the immune cells infiltration of B cells, CD8 +  T cells, CD4 +  T cells, neutrophils, and dendritic cells. However, ASF1B was positively correlated with Treg cell infiltration and inhibitory immune checkpoints in exhausted T cells. Patients who received anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy with high ASF1B expression had a higher objective response.   Conclusion:  The ASF1B level is an independent prognostic factor and may serve as a potential immunotherapeutic target.

ASF1B is a Promising Prognostic Biomarker and Correlates With Immunotherapy Efficacy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma