English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The Agro-Pastoral Ecotone of Northern China (APEC) is a transitional area suffering from severe wind erosion. The wind data used in wind erosion modeling generally have different temporal resolutions and spatial station distributions. Previous studies have suggested that the temporal wind speed resolution influences the prediction of wind erosion events at the field scale. To date, no studies have been conducted to assess the impact of the type of wind data on regional wind erosion estimation. In this study, the Revised Wind Erosion Equation (RWEQ) and the Integrated Wind Erosion Modeling System (IWEMS) were used to evaluate the regional potential wind erosion in the Agro-Pastoral Ecotone of Northern China (APEC) during 2000 and 2012 based on four wind data type scenarios, including basic weather stations with daily wind statistics, basic weather stations with four wind speed measurements per day, reference climatological stations with daily wind statistics, and reference climatological stations with four wind speed measurements per day. The principal results reveal that the potential wind erosion estimates evaluated using the two models are closely correlated with the measured wind erosion data reported in the published literature, but the predicted values are generally lower than the observed values for the different scenarios. The magnitudes of the mean potential wind erosion ranged from 15.73 to 27.33 t ha −1  a −1  by RWEQ and changed between 61.77 and 98.54 t ha −1  a −1  by IWEMS for different scenarios. The spatial distribution and temporal trends of the annual or seasonal potential wind erosion obtained using the two models were similar for the different scenarios. This study revealed that wind speed is the most sensitive input, and hourly wind speed generated by the different temporal interpolation can significantly affect regional wind erosion estimation. Some studies involving precise regional wind erosion estimation, such as the impacts of landscape changes (land use/cover) on wind erosion, ecosystem service evaluation of reducing soil erosion, soil carbon sequestration and emissions through wind erosion, and wind erosion induced surface soil nutrient loss (e.g., nitrogen and phosphorus), may have been influenced by conducting regional wind erosion modeling based on different types of wind data. The users need to calibrate and validate the selected models for precise wind erosion prediction.

Effect of the Type of Wind Data on Regional Potential Wind Erosion Estimation