English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objectives:  Sleep time information is essential for monitoring of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), as the severity assessment depends on the number of breathing disturbances per hour of sleep. However, clinical procedures for sleep monitoring rely on numerous uncomfortable sensors, which could affect sleeping patterns. Therefore, an automated method to identify sleep intervals from unobtrusive data is required. However, most unobtrusive sensors suffer from data loss and sensitivity to movement artifacts. Thus, current sleep detection methods are inadequate, as these require long intervals of good quality. Moreover, sleep monitoring of OSA patients is often less reliable due to heart rate disturbances, movement and sleep fragmentation. The primary aim was to develop a sleep-wake classifier for sleep time estimation of suspected OSA patients, based on single short-term segments of their cardiac and respiratory signals. The secondary aim was to define metrics to detect OSA patients directly from their predicted sleep-wake pattern and prioritize them for clinical diagnosis.   Methods:  This study used a dataset of 183 suspected OSA patients, of which 36 test subjects. First, a convolutional neural network was designed for sleep-wake classification based on healthier patients (AHI < 10). It employed single 30 s epochs of electrocardiograms and respiratory inductance plethysmograms. Sleep information and Total Sleep Time (TST) was derived for all patients using the short-term segments. Next, OSA patients were detected based on the average confidence of sleep predictions and the percentage of sleep-wake transitions in the predicted sleep architecture.   Results:  Sleep-wake classification on healthy, mild and moderate patients resulted in moderate κ scores of 0.51, 0.49, and 0.48, respectively. However, TST estimates decreased in accuracy with increasing AHI. Nevertheless, severe patients were detected with a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 89%, and prioritized for clinical diagnosis. As such, their inaccurate TST estimate becomes irrelevant. Excluding detected OSA patients resulted in an overall estimated TST with a mean bias error of 21.9 (± 55.7) min and Pearson correlation of 0.74 to the reference.   Conclusion:  The presented framework offered a realistic tool for unobtrusive sleep monitoring of suspected OSA patients. Moreover, it enabled fast prioritization of severe patients for clinical diagnosis.

Sleep Diagnostics for Home Monitoring of Sleep Apnea Patients