English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background:  Wave intensity analysis is useful for analyzing coronary hemodynamics. Much of its clinical application involves the identification of waves indicated by peaks in the wave intensity and relating their presence or absence to different cardiovascular events. However, the analysis of wave intensity peaks can be problematic because of the associated noise in the measurements. This study shows how wave intensity analysis can be enhanced by using a Maximum Entropy Method (MEM).   Methods:  We introduce a MEM to differentiate between “peaks” and “background” in wave intensity waveforms. We apply the method to the wave intensity waveforms measured in the left anterior descending coronary artery from 10 Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and 11 Controls with normal cardiac function. We propose a naming convention for the significant waves and compare them across the cohorts.   Results:  Using a MEM enhances wave intensity analysis by identifying twice as many significant waves as previous studies. The results are robust when MEM is applied to the log transformed wave intensity data and when all of the measured data are used. Comparing waves across cohorts, we suggest that the absence of a forward expansion wave in HOCM can be taken as an indication of HOCM. Our results also indicate that the backward compression waves in HOCM are significantly larger than in Controls; unlike the forward compression waves where the wave energy in Controls is significantly higher than in HOCM. Comparing the smaller secondary waves revealed by MEM, we find some waves that are present in the majority of Controls and absent in almost all HOCM, and other waves that are present in some HOCM patients but entirely absent in Controls. This suggests some diagnostic utility in the clinical measurement of these waves, which can be a positive sign of HOCM or a subgroup with a particular pathology.   Conclusion:  The MEM enhances wave intensity analysis by identifying many more significant waves. The method is novel and can be applied to wave intensity analysis in all arteries. As an example, we show how it can be useful in the clinical study of hemodynamics in the coronary arteries in HOCM.

The Use of Maximum Entropy to Enhance Wave Intensity Analysis: An Application to Coronary Arteries in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy