English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background:  DNA methylation is a common event in the early development of various tumors, including breast cancer (BRCA), which has been studies as potential tumor biomarkers. Although previous studies have reported a cluster of aberrant promoter methylation changes in BRCA, none of these research groups have proved the specificity of these DNA methylation changes. Here we aimed to identify specific DNA methylation signatures in BRCA which can be used as diagnostic and prognostic markers.   Methods:  Differentially methylated sites were identified using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) BRCA data set. We screened for BRCA-differential methylation by comparing methylation profiles of BRCA patients, healthy breast biopsies and blood samples. These differential methylated sites were compared to nine main cancer samples to identify BRCA specific methylated sites. A BayesNet model was built to distinguish BRCA patients from healthy donors. The model was validated using three Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) independent data sets. In addition, we also carried out the Cox regression analysis to identify DNA methylation markers which are significantly related to the overall survival (OS) rate of BRCA patients and verified them in the validation cohort.   Results:  We identified seven differentially methylated sites (DMSs) that were highly correlated with cell cycle as potential specific diagnostic biomarkers for BRCA patients. The combination of 7 DMSs achieved ~94% sensitivity in predicting BRCA, ~95% specificity comparing healthy vs. cancer samples, and ~88% specificity in excluding other cancers. The 7 DMSs were highly correlated with cell cycle. We also identified 6 methylation sites that are highly correlated with the OS of BRCA patients and can be used to accurately predict the survival of BRCA patients (training cohort: likelihood ratio = 70.25,  p  = 3.633 × 10 −13 , area under the curve (AUC) = 0.784; validation cohort: AUC = 0.734). Stratification analysis by age, clinical stage, Tumor types, and chemotherapy retained statistical significance.   Conclusion:  In summary, our study demonstrated the role of methylation profiles in the diagnosis and prognosis of BRCA. This signature is superior to currently published methylation markers for diagnosis and prognosis for BRCA patients. It can be used as promising biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis of BRCA.

Integrative Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression to Determine Specific Diagnostic Biomarkers and Prognostic Biomarkers of Breast Cancer