Grammatical category mediates the bilingual disadvantage in word retrieval

Bultena, S. et al. (2013). Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1350-1377. Cho-Reyes, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2012). Aphasiology, 26, 1250-1277. Faroqi-Shah, Y. (2012). In M. R. Gitterman, M. Goral & L. K. Obler (Eds.), Aspects of multilingual aphasia. Clevedon, UK. Gollan, T. H. et al. (2008). Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 787-797. Goodglass, H., et al. (2001). Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Ivanova, I., & Costa, A. (2008). Psychologica, 127, 277-288. Kauschke, C., & von Frankenberg, J. (2008). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 243-257. Kertesz, A. (2006). Western Aphasia Battery-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Klassert, A. et al. (2014). Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 73-88. Sandoval, T. C. et al. (2010). Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 231-252. Funded by: American Speech-Language Hearing Association Author Contact: yfshah@umd.edu; lisa.milman@usu.edu 1. Investigate if the bilingual disadvantage is influenced by grammatical category • Weaker links hypothesis → similar disadvantage for nouns and verbs; frequency effect