English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Many transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiments have reported the presence of motor inhibition during action preparation. Most studies have used instructed-delay choice reaction time (CRT) tasks requiring subjects to select a response based on a preparatory cue, but to withhold that response until the appearance of a GO signal. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are typically suppressed when probed during the delay period, close to the GO signal, and this effect occurs regardless of whether the muscle in which MEPs are elicited is selected (S) or non-selected (NS) for the forthcoming response. Although preparatory inhibition is very robust, some discrepancies have been observed regarding its strength. Several studies have reported a stronger MEP suppression when a muscle is S for the forthcoming movement, compared to when it is NS, while others have failed to replicate such findings, especially when MEP suppression is probed in the dominant hand. In that case, the effect is even...

Testing the influence of various parameters on preparatory motor inhibition: a possible explanation for discrepancies between previous studies?