English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Existing approaches to formation of quantitative indicator of resilience of objects of different complexity operating under conditions of external impacts are discussed. Advantages and disadvantages of approaches under discussion are specified. As general basis for application of resilience concept, the class of so-called target-driven systems oriented to achieving some preset target in a certain period is marked out. It is proposed to use the value of the indicator constructed using methodical apparatus "difficulties of achieving target" of I. B. Russman for quantitative assessment of resilience of similar systems. Methods of calculation and results of model assessments of resilience using this approach are presented. Directions of Russman’s approach development are proposed based on application of so-called method of trajectory analysis of behavior of target-driven systems, described by dynamics of integral indicator characterizing object of study in coordinates of rate and acceleration of its changes. KeywordsCritical infrastructure, Dynamic corridor, Difficulty of achieving target, Resilience criterion, Risk, Reference vectors.

Development of Assessment Methods of Target-Driven Systems Resilience