English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

much of a problem in each item had been during the past one month and the children themselves after receiving proper instructions filled the questionnaires. A 5-point scale was used to rate the severity of items (0-never, 1-almost never, 2sometimes, 3-often and 4-almost often). On the pediatric quality of life inventory generic core scales, items were scored in a reverse manner and then linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale and higher score indicated better health related quality of life. For reverse scoring, 0-4 scale items were transformed to 100-0 as 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25 and 4=0. Adding the scores of all items then made the total mean quality of life score. The data was statistically analyzed by SPSS (version 12) software. All data was subjected to descriptive statistics. Differences among the groups for demographic profiles were analyzed using chi-square test. ANOVA (analysis of variance) was used for comparison of means between groups and within groups. “t–test” was used to compare CLP and non CLP subjects in age groups of 7-10 years,11-13 years,14-16 years and 16-24 years for Self Concept scores and Quality of Life.

Psychological Implications of Cleft Lip and Palate (CLP) in Children