English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Research the influence of errors on the measurement results is always an urgent task. Analysis of such values makes it possible to assess the nature of the change and the magnitude of the impact of errors for their further consideration or compensation, or minimization. In this paper, the errors in determining ellipsoidal heights from GNSS observations are considered. In determining the ellipsoidal heights, this method can achieve an accuracy of 1–2 cm in static mode (Static) and 2–4 cm in real time mode (RTK). Thus, the accuracy of the chosen mode of observations will indicate the initial limits of the ellipsoidal heights errors influence, and the factors that arise directly during observations and data processing will determine the extent to which these errors will change relative to the initial limits. The purpose of this work is to analyze the errors of ellipsoidal heights based on the results of GNSS-leveling obtained in the static and RTK modes. Method. The study used GNSS-leveling data at 17 points (wall and soil benchmarks) of leveling lines of I–II classes, which are located within a radius of 15 km from the permanent station SULP of the Lviv Polytechnic National University. Observations were performed in static mode (4-hour) and RTK (8–10 measurements). Points are divided into three categories (5–6 points): 1) statics on wall benchmarks; 2) real-time mode on wall benchmarks; 3) static mode on soil benchmarks. By combining methods and categories, four GNSS networks were formed, including 11, 11, 12 and 17 points. Results. For each category, the percentages within which the errors of ellipsoidal heights change in static observation mode and real-time mode using the GNSS leveling method are presented. On the basis of the received information it is established that for the first case errors of ellipsoidal heights on the average change within ± 43 %, for the second ± 36 %, and for the third ± 14 %. The analysis of statistical characteristics for each category shows that the standard deviation of the static mode data is 2 % and 19 %, and the RTK mode – 12 %, respectively. Scientific novelty and practical significance. The nature of the change in the error limits of the ellipsoidal heights determination gives an idea of what accuracy should be expected when performing GNSS-leveling depending on the mode of observation. Such data play an important role in solving scientific and applied problems by GNSS leveling, such as the constructions of new leveling networks or monitoring the height points of existing networks.

Analysis of erypsoidal heights errors based on GNSS-leveling results