English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

It has been common to represent relations between the WHO and UNICEF as cooperative and collaborative in the early decades of the history of both.  By focusing on tuberculosis programmes in South Asia this article argues that this was not always the case.  The International Tuberculosis Campaign (ITC) was a Scandinavian venture that pioneered Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination in South Asia immediately after the Second World War.  Both UNICEF and the WHO involved themselves with ITC activities and the impact of this is traced in India.  By the 1950s it appears that the UNICEF focus on BCG vaccination had won out over the WHO preference for a broader-based approach to tuberculosis and this article examines the reasons why

Settling the Matter on Indian Soil: Frictions between WHO and UNICEF over Vaccination against Tuberculosis, 1947-51