English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Two geostrategically important regions the Caucasus and Central Asia still remain as one of the instable and “blackly” pliable ones from international security perspective. Namely, on case of Afghanistan is very clear case. The country is still considering as a source-drive actor of so-called “Asymmetric Threats” emanated from the “Taliban” movement as a non-state political actor. Jihadist movements’ activation in Afghanistan caused direct military threats toward Central Asia and Caucasus regions and certainly after NATO ISAF mission, the situation could more deteriorate. Among asymmetric threats include – drug smuggling, arms illegal trafficking, export of Political Islam doctrinal scripts, military Jihadist network, international terrorism, etc. Global actors – USA, Russia, NATO, and China are seeking to cope with those challenges stemming from “Taliban” and “Islamic Caliphate” (DAESH) forces as well as “Al-Qaida” and this strategy needs joint efforts together with strategic partners in combating these new military actors at global and regional levels. 1 Vakhtang Maisaia, PhD, Head of MA Program in International Security Studies, Associate Professor of Caucasus International University. Email: vakhtang.maisaia@ciu.edu.ge 2 Jon Scott, Retired U.S. Colonel, PhD Candidate, Faculty of Education and Humanities, International Black Sea University. Email: jgs62@aol.com „Ante Portas – Studia nad Bezpieczeństwem”

ante portas

JIHADIST HYBRID WAR AS MILITARY STRATEGY FOR AGGRESSIVE NON-STATE RELIGIOUS ACTORS – MAIN CHARACTERISTICS AND DOCTRINAL IMPLICATIONS OF MODERN TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS (DAESH, TALIBAN AND “CAUCASUS ISLAMIC EMIRATE” CASES)