English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The topic of this article is devoted to the analysis of controversial, problematic aspects affecting the procedural order of the courts reviewing applications for interim measures, or, as expressly stated in the law, statements about securing a claim. The author of this article has studied the different views of process scientists, as well as the law enforcement practice of arbitration courts to consider these issues. Ключевые слова: арбитражный процесс, обеспечительные меры, арбитражный процессуальный кодекс, судопроизводство.

Actual Issues of the Procedure for Considering Applications for Securing a Claim in the Arbitration Process