English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The paper shows the features of the application of special knowledge when conducting forensic examinations in the field of antitrust laws. In particular, it is shown that such examinations require deep knowledge in various fields, therefore it is advisable to create competition in this market. To do this, it is necessary to give non-state experts the appropriate status, equating them to government agencies. And in state institutions to introduce judicial expertise in the sphere of violations of antitrust regulation. Only the appearance on the market of various institutions conducting examinations in the area of violations of antitrust laws will improve the quality of such examinations. In addition, it is necessary to make the procedure for appointing the examination by the antimonopoly authority more mobile. To this end, it is proposed to amend the legislation to the effect that the decision to confer the status of an expert and conduct an examination should be made in one definition.

Current Problems of Use of Special Knowledge During the Investigation of Offenses in the Sphere of the Antitrust Law