English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Farmers are increasingly using management systems such as moving cows out of paddocks onto stand-off pads to protect wet soils from damage during winter. Studies were carried out to investigate nutrient and faecal bacterial retention or loss from stand-off pad materials. A preliminary laboratory study found that a range of natural materials, including crushed pine bark, wood chips, zeolite and soil can retain between 66% and 76% of applied cows’ excreta nitrogen (N). Zeolite was found to be particularly good at reducing ammonia (NH 3 ) volatilisation losses from the columns. A field-scale standoff pad study at a Waikato dairy farm, in the winter season of 2005, indicated that carbon (C)-rich materials including both bark and sawdust can be used as standoff pad materials with effective retention of N and faecal bacteria. Both bark and sawdust pads retained about 60% of deposited excreta N. Substantially more Escherichia coli were recovered in the drainage from the bark pad (total yield 3.1 x 10 E. coli) than from the sawdust pad (total yield 7.5 x 10 E. coli) demonstrating that sawdust was more effective than bark in retaining these faecal bacteria.

Control of pollutants using stand-off pads containing different natural materials