English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Aim/Background: The prospective study is planned to compare results of: Graham’s omentopexy v/s figure of eight stitch in case of peptic perforation. Material and Method: A study of 50 patients admitted with peptic perforations at J.L.N. Medical College & Associated group of Hospitals, Ajmer were undertaken from January 2012 to December 2013.The patients suspected of peptic perforations undergoing emergency laparotomy were divided into 2 groups (Graham’s omentopexy and Figure of eight closure) of 25 patients each based on the technique of Simple Randomization. Results: In our study figure of 8 stitches with omentopexy is have less postoperative complications compare with Gramh’s omentopexy (leak 1 v/s 3, wound infection 4 v/s 8, fistula 0 v/s 3, death 1 v/s 2). Conclusion: Closure by figure of 8 stitch was found to be a superior surgical technique over Graham’s omentopexy for the closure of peptic perforation.

A prospective study for comparison between graham’s omentopexy v/s figure of eight closures in cases of peptic perforation