English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The exact number of wound cases is difficult to determine; however, in a country like India, with a population of over 1 billion, there are around 700,000-800,000 burn admissions per year. With availability of various products for dressing this study intends to compare honey dressing v/s silver sulfadiazine at our institute.Materials and Methods:Type of study: Prospective ObservationalStudy design: Cross Sectional StudyStudy population:•Age: more than 18 years•Gender: Both male & femaleStudy duration: 12 MonthsStudy centre: Department of Surgery, Dhiraj General HospitalStudy sample size: In present study, we have enrolled total 40 patients.Results: Out of total 40 patients 57.50% were male and 42.50% were female and all the patients were divided into two groups i.e. Honey group and SSD group. Mean age of all the enrolled participants was 59.91 ± 9.89 years. Mean healing days required was significantly less in honey group compare to mean healing days required in SSD group, i.e. 12.47±4.15 vs. 15.78±5.78. We found p value was 0.000 which is highly significant.Conclusion: Honey dressings is superior to Silver sulfadiazine (SSD) in chronic ulcer and burns, in terms of decreased morbidity, economy, patient well-being and speedy rehabilitation.

Effect of honey impregnated dressing v/s silver sulfadiazine in healing of chronic ulcer and burns