English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The author examines the procedural position of the injured person during the entire course of criminal proceedings, with respect to both the pre-trial and trial stage. In connection with the procedural status of the injured person, the author also analyses the possibilities of the participation of the injured person or his/her representative in procedural acts performed by law enforcement authorities and courts in order to fulfil their own subject of criminal proceedings, which also involves deciding on the injured person’s compensation claim for damage caused to him as a result of the given crime. At the beginning of the article, the author presents the historical aspects of the procedural status of the injured person in the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic, which form a basis for presenting a comparative perspective on the status of the injured person in the two legal systems. At the end of the article, the author formulates his own de lege ferenda proposals in the context of the Slovak Republic.

PROCEDURAL STATUS OF THE INJURED PERSON IN THE LEGAL ORDER OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC IN COMPARISON WITH ITS LEGAL REGULATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC