English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Chemical analysis of fish otoliths has become an important technique in fisheries sci- ence with widespread applications. Most research up to this point has focused predominantly on sagittal otoliths, but the underlying assumptions may also apply to lapilli. The goal of this study was to determine whether lapilli and sagittae have the same otolith chemistry and whether one can be substituted for the other for solution-based chemical analysis in wild-captured fish. We compared the stable isotope chemistry (δ 13 C and δ 18 O) of paired sagittae and lapilli of juvenile spotted seatrout Cynoscion nebulosus collected from Chesapeake Bay seagrass beds in 2002. Stable isotopic signa- tures were significantly different in both carbon and oxygen for paired sagittae and lapilli. Both δ 13 C and δ 18 O values were higher in the sagitta relative to the lapillus. As a correlate to isotopic analysis, shape measurements were taken on paired sagittae and lapilli for growth comparison. While the 2 otoliths are a similar size at formation, the sagitta grows faster, quickly outgrowing the lapillus dur- ing the juvenile stage. We expected that after detrending isotope data to account for fish length, the relation with otolith growth would become clear. Surprisingly, this was not true for either δ 13 C or δ 18 O. Carbon isotopic differences appear to be strongly influenced by metabolism, and the relationship of δ 18 O with otolith growth is obscured by a variable environment. Our results clearly show that sagit- tae is not equal to lapilli for solution-based whole otolith analysis. Moreover, while the sagitta reflects the juvenile stage environment with greater fidelity, the lapillus reflects the larval stage more strongly.

Substituting otoliths for chemical analyses: Does sagitta = lapillus?