English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The major groups of mot~le cryptofauna lnhab~tlng dead coral substrata across several environmental zones of Davies Reef In the central Great Barner Reef, Austral~a, have been quantified In general terms of both numbers and b~omass the main groups of ep~benth~c cryptofauna were harpac- hco~d copepods, gammar~d amph~pods, syll~d polychaetes and gastropod n~olluscs Other crustaceans abundant In some locat~ons were so pods tana~ds and ostracods Copepods compr~sed 55 to 60 % of total number of cryptofauna over all reef locations and up to 28 % of b~omass Polychaetes were usually the dominant biomass component of the fauna Abundance of total cryptofauna vaned wth reef locat~on, being h~ghest on the fore-reef region In terms of both density and biomass Damself~sh terntones were shown to be a refuge for cryptofauna In all locat~ons of the reef Mean density of anlmals ins~de territories was 58 300 m-2 an average of 3 6 tlmes h~gher than on adjacent, well-grazed surfaces Cryptofaunal abundance was closely related to algal abundance and not complex~ty of the coral rock substratum It IS predicted that cryptofauna are s~gn~f~cant consumers of epilithic algae and associated matenal In locations such as damselfish terntones, on coral reefs

Motile cryptofauna of a coral reef: abundance, distribution and trophic potential