English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The US Endangered Species Act (ESA) allows protection of any species that is at risk in all or 'a significant portion of its range' (SPOIR). Because this provision is open to many possible interpretations, the agencies responsible for implementing the ESA recently published a SPOIR policy. The policy is based on a framework we developed that asks a simple question: 'If the por- tions of the range that are currently at risk were lost, would the entire species, at that point, be threatened or endangered?' If so, the portion of the range is significant. Some commentators have argued that the policy departs from goals the ESA was originally intended to accomplish. We dis- agree; biologists and managers struggling to implement provisions of the ESA in complex, real- world situations need practical guidance, and we believe our framework provides that. In partic- ular, it avoids as much as possible normative considerations in evaluating 'significance' in terms of human values; instead, we focus on significance to the species, which is consistent with the ESA focus on preventing extinctions, as well as with the mandate that listing determinations be based 'solely' on scientific information. However, we agree with some critics that a crucial factor in implementation of the policy will be how historical versus current concepts of range are recon- ciled. We believe that historical distribution and abundance are important, not as specific restora- tion goals, but as reference points that characterize conditions under which we are confident the species was viable.

When is a species at risk in ‘all or a significant portion of its range’?