English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Two models of the North Sea are compared with respect to their performance in the assessment of sea level changes in a changing climate: the OPYC model, originally designed as a global ocean model and run in a regional version, and the HAMSOM, which was built as a shelf sea model and applied to an extended region in a simplified version. Both models agree very well in their hindcast skill as measured by correlation and explained variance. The reaction of both models to the '2 〈 CO2' and 'control' runs of the time slice experiments of the DKRZ (German Climate Computing Center) is also very similar and indicates an increase of up to 30 cm of winter mean sea levels and no significant (compared with the variability in the past) impact on the intra-monthly 90% quantiles. It is concluded that sea level is a rather robust parameter that could still be assessed with some confidence if both models were simplified further.

Two models for the climate change related development of sea levels in the North Sea-a comparison