English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Data from the 14 C method, C assimilation time courses and single endpoint comparisons to O 2 fluxes, imply 2 different things. Time course (linear) experiments suggest that C assimilation measures gross production while the single endpoint comparisons with O 2 fluxes suggest that the 14 C method approximates net community production. Considering only phytoplankton metabolism, a way out of the paradox is to assume that all CO 2 respired by mitochondria is refixed in photosynthesis, meaning that photosynthesis uses more H 2 O than CO 2 from the ambient environment since the latter has an internal source. The 14 C method, therefore, would estimate net primary production relative to O 2 fluxes in the absence of heterotrophic interactions. The method can also be applied to the estimation of phytoplankton respiration from the nighttime loss of labeled organic matter. A summary of available data shows that C assimilation corrected for organic C lost is statistically equivalent to gross production measured independently using the 18 O method.

Net and gross productivity: weighing in with 14C