English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

CT venography (CTV) is being increasingly used to diagnose DVT or other venous pathology, because it offers a rapid and available alternative to sonography (1). In previous studies, CTV was reported to have 89–97% sensitivity and 94–100% specificity for the detection of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the pelvis and lower extremities (2-4). Due to concerns associated with ionizing radiation exposure, several dose reduction methods have been developed by CT manufacturers (5). Recently, lower tube voltages have been applied to reduce radiation dose during CT acquisition, and other methods, such as tube current modulation and the usages of noise reduction filters and a higher pitch, have also been shown to be effective (6). Comparison of Image Qualities of 80 kVp and 120 kVp CT Venography Using Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction at Same Radiation Dose      80 kVp 120 kVp