English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Prosthetic hip replacement surgery is a relatively safe procedure, but there are post-operative complications. Even though complication rates are low, there are many total hip implant treatments, so radiologists commonly encounter CT images of patients with hip replacement surgery and periprosthetic complications in daily practice (1-4). On CT, metallic hip prostheses can cause severe artifacts, limiting evaluation of anatomic structures near the metal, impair diagnostic confidence, and potentially prevent detection of complications. There are standard metal artifact reduction techniques applied to image acquisition and reconstruction (5). But artifacts exist, particularly in presence of large amounts of metallic hardware, such as total joint arthroplasties. Currently, the most commonly used CT image reconstruction algorithm is filtered back projection. Standard filtered back projection (SFBP) is an analytic reconstruction algorithm that asComparison of Metal Artifact Reduction for Orthopedic Implants versus Standard Filtered Back Projection: Value of Postoperative CT after Hip Replacement       CT      CT  :     CT

daehan yeongsang uihak hoeji/daehan yeongsang ui haghoeji

Comparison of Metal Artifact Reduction for Orthopedic Implants versus Standard Filtered Back Projection: Value of Postoperative CT after Hip Replacement