English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Purpose: To identify radio-clinico-pathologic factors that result in false negative FDG uptake on F-FDG -PET/CT in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a total of 140 breast lesions in 140 patients (mean age: 51.3 years) who underwent PET/CT for the staging of breast cancer from May 2007 to January 2008. All patients were divided as false negative (group 1, n=20) or true positive (group 2, n=120). A retrospective analysis was performed to analyze the statistical differences in clinico-pathologic factors between groups 1 and 2 using the Mann-Whitney U test, as well as the stepwise logistic regression analysis and the Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test. Results: Estrogen receptor positivity, mass on mammography, carcinoma in situ, and size were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (p

Radio-Clinico-Pathologic Factors of False Negative18F-FDG PET/CT Results in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

Radio-Clinico-Pathologic Factors of False Negative¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT Results in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer