English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Dear Editor,  Multiple infections with small liver flukes and minute intestinal flukes are the serious public health concern in the lower Mekong basin [1,2]. Although the epidemiological survey for those trematode infections are primarily carried out based on copro-parasitological examination, detection/identification of fecal eggs/worms is a tedious job and often problematic because of the morphological similarities of eggs/worms. Along with the popularization of PCR-sequencing methods, copro-DNA diagnosis and molecular phylogenetic identification/speciation have been introduced in epidemiological studies. Among various genes and non-coding lesions of nuclear and mitochondrial DNAs, mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COXI) is one of the most widely used inter- and intra-species marker. Using COXI and some other markers, Lee and his colleagues performed molecular phylogenetic analyses on small liver flukes (Lee SU, Huh S. Variation of nuclear and mitochondrial DNAs in Korean and Chinese isolates of Clonorchis sinensis. Korean J Parasitol 2004; 42: 145-148) and on minute intestinal flukes (Lee SU, Huh S, Sohn WM, Chai JY. Sequence comparisons of 28S ribosomal DNA and mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I of Metagonimus yokogawai, M. takahashii and M. miyatai. Korean J Parasitol 2004; 42: 129-135).  The COX1 gene sequences appeared in those articles are; Clonorchis sinensis ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF184619","term_id":"296940320","term_text":"AF184619"}}AF184619, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF181889","term_id":"285026682","term_text":"AF181889"}}AF181889, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF188122","term_id":"285809842","term_text":"AF188122"}}AF188122), Metagonimus yokogawai ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF096230","term_id":"297039733","term_text":"AF096230"}}AF096230), Metagonimus takahashii ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF096231","term_id":"297039734","term_text":"AF096231"}}AF096231), Metagonimus miyatai ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF096232","term_id":"297039735","term_text":"AF096232"}}AF096232), Pygidiopsis summa ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF181884","term_id":"288563287","term_text":"AF181884"}}AF181884), and Stellantchasmus falcatus ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF181887","term_id":"285804435","term_text":"AF181887"}}AF181887). In addition, Park [3] compared his COXI sequence of Opisthorchis viverrini Laotian isolate (AY055 382) to those of Gymnophalloides seoi ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF096234","term_id":"297039736","term_text":"AF096234"}}AF096234) and Neodiplostomum seoulense ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF096233","term_id":"285026845","term_text":"AF096233"}}AF096233) registered in the DNA database (Lee et al. unpublished).  For the phylogenetic analyses of COXI gene of minute intestinal flukes of our own data, we have downloaded all those above mentioned COXI of Lee et al. and aligned them including our own COXI sequence of Haplorchis taichui ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"EF055885","term_id":"119855482","term_text":"EF055885"}}EF055885) [4] and Paragonimus bangkokensis ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AB354227","term_id":"155369203","term_text":"AB354227"}}AB354227) [5]. Surprisingly, those sequence data were divided into 2 distinct groups without any similarities (Fig. 1). Eventually, we realized that this astonishing result is due to the reverse complementary sequences of COXI data deposited by Lee et al. (in the bottom half of the figure). We also noticed similar mixed-up deposition of the forward and reverse sequences of COXI gene of Fasciola spp., which were also included in Fig. 1 ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AJ628024","term_id":"88319716","term_text":"AJ628024"}}AJ628024, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AJ628039","term_id":"88319746","term_text":"AJ628039"}}AJ628039, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"FJ469984","term_id":"238631966","term_text":"FJ469984"}}FJ469984; Zhu XQ et al. unpublished).    Fig. 1  The DNA sequence alignment of the partial COXI gene of some trematodes obtained from the GenBank. Seven sequences from the top are the forward strands with JB3 primer sequence, and 2 in the middle are the forward strands without primer. Eight sequences ...    For the determination of partial COX1 sequences of Platyhelminthes, the primer set of JB3 (5'-TTT TTT GGG CAT CCT GAG GTT TAT-3') and JB4.5 (5'-TAA AGA AAG AAC ATA ATG AAA ATG-3') [6] was widely used for investigating the inter- and intra-species variations of trematodes and cestodes. We noticed the mixed-up of the forward and reverse COXI sequences by Lee et al. as well as Zhu et al. because of the presence of the characteristic feature of this primer set (boxed in Fig. 1) in the sequences. The primer sequence should be deleted from the sequence data because it is not always identical with the real DNA sequence of the gene and the inclusion of the primer sequences sometimes causes the misreading in phylogenetic analyses [7]. In 3 reverse sequences, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF181884","term_id":"288563287","term_text":"AF181884"}}AF181884, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AY055380","term_id":"22203992","term_text":"AY055380"}}AY055380, and {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF096233","term_id":"285026845","term_text":"AF096233"}}AF096233 seems to contain also the partial sequence of the cloning vector, which should be trimmed off before deposition.  In general, raw data of forward and reverse sequences obtained from the sequencer should be aligned manually by cross-checking of the wave patterns because some 10-20 bases downstream from the forward primer and upstream from the reverse primer often contain erroneous base pairs [8]. Deposition of the reverse sequence means that those sequences were not aligned against forward sequence and not quite reliable.  Since each sequence data in GenBank are opened for the public use, an accuracy of the sequence data is critically important for the mutual reliability of the scientists. The scientists should aware how to deposit accurate sequence data to the DNA data base. The reappraisal and correction of those sequences mentioned above is urgently necessary.

Double Strand Problems: Reverse DNA Sequences Deposited in the DNA Database