English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper builds upon initial findings as a first step in building a model to assess the efficacy of attorney disciplinary systems or processes in individual states or appellate regions. Reports compiled by state oversight organizations or boards responsible for investigation and disciplinary proceedings due to complaints filed against attorneys were analyzed to begin construction of the model. The model has been expanded geographically by appellate regions. This paper examines the states located in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Toward a Model for Evaluating Attorney Discipline Across Regions: The Ninth Circuit