English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Purpose: To compare the axial lengths, anterior chamber depths, and keratometric measurements and to predict postoperative refractions of Dual Scheimpflug analyzer Galilei G6 and intra ocular lens (IOL) Master. Methods: A total of 50 eyes in 50 patients who received cataract surgery were included in the present study. The axial length, anterior chamber depth, and keratometry were measured using 2 types of partial coherence interferometries (Galilei G6 and IOL Master). The SRK/T formula was used to calculate IOL power and the predictive error which subtracts predictive refraction from postoperative refraction was compared between the ocular biometry devices. Results: Axial lengths were 23.36 ± 0.80 mm and 23.36 ± 0.90 mm measured by Galilei G6 and IOL Master, respectively. Axial length measured by Galilei G6 was not statistically significant compared with IOL Master (p = 0.321). The anterior chamber depth and keratometry were 3.22 ± 0.35 mm and 44.29 ± 1.40 D measured by Galilei G6 and 3.11 ± 0.46 mm and 44.39 ± 1.41 D measured by IOL Master, respectively. The differences of anterior chamber depth and keratometry between the 2 devices were statistically significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.028, respectively). The mean absolute prediction errors were 0.45 ± 0.37 D and 0.49 ± 0.39 D in Galilei G6 and IOL Master, respectively and was not statistically significantly different (p = 0.423). Conclusions: The ocular biometric measurements and prediction of postoperative refraction using Galilei G6 were as accurate as with IOL Master. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2015;56(4):515-520

Comparison of Ocular Biometry and Postoperative Refraction in Cataract Patients Between Lenstar® and IOL Master®