English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Diversity an advantage or a problem? Diversity is often regarded as the richness and advantage of the EU, at least in many official speeches made by the Commission representatives, all the way up to Commissioner Franz Fischler. But at the same time we should ask whether it is possible, or sensible, to have a common agricultural policy in the EU especially as it will become even more diverse after enlargement, i.e. as the EU-15 will become the EU-25. The CAP was made for the six founding Member States of the EU: now there are 15 Member States, and in 2004 there will be 25 Member States. How has the CAP developed and responded to the changes in the EU during 40 years? Is it still, or has it ever been, common and fair enough for all Member States, including such northern countries as Finland, or southern country as Portugal? What about the Eastern Enlargement and the so-called commonness of agricultural policy?

Can the CAP cope with the enlarged European Union?