English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this study was to find the top five rankings of sharia finance contracts with the potential for fraud (case study of three sharia commercial banks) in North Sumatra. This research uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods, data analysis with Analytical Networking Process (ANP) techniques through Super Decision Software, conducting open and in-depth interviews with 9 respondents, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with practitioners and sharia finance experts. In this case, it was found that the top five rankings of sharia financial contracts have the potential for fraud (a case study of three sharia commercial banks) in North Sumatra, namely Ijarah 23.34%, murabahah 14.86%, kafalah or kafalah bil ujrah 8.71%, musyarakah 8.22% and mudharabah 6.28%.

Top Five Ranking of Sharia Financial Acades with the Potential of Fraud (Case Study of Three Sharia Commercial Banks) In North Sumatera