English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study aims to describe the comparative implementation of learning outcome evaluations applied at MTsN1 Medan by using the 2013 KTSP and Curriculum 2013. The method used in this study is qualitative methodology. Data collection techniques consist of observation, interviews, and documentation. The research findings indicate differences in the assessment of learning outcomes between the KTSP curriculum and 2013 curriculum include aspects of application in the classroom, assessment aspects, aspects of the assessment system, aspects of assessment instruments, aspects of portfolio assessment concepts, aspects of report card format, aspects of value list format, aspects of competency achievement indicators, aspects of competency achievement indicators, aspects graduate competency standards, standard aspects of assessment and aspects of value ranges.

Evaluation of Learning Outcome: Comparative Education Unit Level Curriculum with the 2013 Curriculum in MTsN 1 Medan