English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a curative treatment option for patients with hematologic malignancies. However, it is unclear whether HLA discrepancy between graft and first donor has an impact on the outcome of second transplantation. We retrospectively analyzed 646 patients receiving second transplantation after an initial HLA mismatched transplantation. With regard to graft- versus -host, the one-allele mismatch (1 mismatch) group (SHR, 1.88; 95%CI: 0.79-4.45; P =0.163) and more than one-allele mismatch group (≥ 2 mismatch) (SHR, 1.84; 95%CI, 0.75-4.51; P =0.182) had higher risks of grade III-IV acute graft- versus -host disease (GvHD) compared to the HLA-matched (0 mismatch) group. In contrast, no difference in risk of acute GvHD was found among the 0, 1, and ≥ 2 mismatch group with respect to graft- versus -first donor. With regard to graft- versus -host, the ≥ 2 mismatch group showed a significantly higher risk of treatment-related mortality (SHR, 1.90; 95%CI, 1.04-3.50; P =0.038) compared to the 0 mismatch group, while the risk of relapse was slightly lower in the ≥ 2 mismatch group (SHR, 068; 95%CI, 0.44-1.06; P =0.086). In contrast, with regard to graft- versus -first donor, there were no significant differences in treatment-related mortality or relapse among the three groups. These findings suggested that HLA discrepancy between graft and host induces transplant-related immunological responses in second transplantation leading to an increase in treatment-related mortality, in contrast, the biological effects of HLA discrepancy between graft and first donor on outcome may be negligible.

HLA discrepancy between graft and host rather than that graft and first donor impact the second transplant outcome