English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

O presente artigo objetiva analisar os processos de construcao de discursos e decisoes juridicas a partir da Teoria da Argumentacao de Robert Alexy em dialogo com o Constitucionalismo Discursivo no Estado Democratico de Direito. Ancorado no metodo analitico e tecnica de pesquisa bibliografica, o trabalho possibilitara abordar como questao central a ponderacao de principios, que e utilizada como principal metodologia para justificacao de uma decisao judicial e nao para a sua construcao racional, como originalmente propoe a teoria. A principal hipotese levantada e que a concepcao de principios como mandados de otimizacao permite a relativizacao dos direitos fundamentais e sociais a partir do uso seletivo da tecnica da ponderacao. Devido a essa caracteristica de indeterminacao, a teoria da ponderacao tornou-se conveniente para a nao vinculacao de direitos fundamentais no Constitucionalismo Discursivo, um desafio no Estado Democratico de Direito. Como resultado, observa-se que a teoria da ponderacao e utilizada como concepcao de discurso e decisao juridica que reproduz e mantem desigualdades sociais.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Direito. Decisao. Ponderacao. Principios. Robert Alexy. Abstract The present article aims to analyze the processes of construction of discourses and juridical decisions from the Theory of Argumentation of Robert Alexy in a dialogue with the Discursive Constitutionalism in the Democratic State of Law. Based on the analytical method and on the technique of bibliographical research, the present work will make it possible to approach as a central issue the weighting of principles, which is used as the main methodology for justification of a judicial decision and not for its rational construction, as originally proposed by the theory. The main hypothesis raised is that the conception of principles as mandates of optimization allows the relativization of fundamental and social rights through a selective use of weighting technique. Due to this feature of indeterminacy, the theory of weighting has become a convenient way for the fundamental rights to not be binding in the Discursive Constitutionalism, a challenge in the Democratic State of Law. As a result, it is observed that the theory of weighting is used as a conception of discourse and juridical decision that reproduces and maintains social inequalities.KEYWORDS: Law. Decision. Weighting. Principles. Robert Alexy.

Ponderação à brasileira: a racionalidade da decisão judicial em Robert Alexy como desafio do Estado Constitucional Democrático