English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study aims to compare the paradigms of media regulation in Indonesia, namely print media (press), broadcasting, and film. Using a comparative study, this research found that the dominant paradigms underlying media regulation in Indonesia varied. Press regulations adhere to the democratic paradigm, while broadcasting adheres to a semi-democratic paradigm, and films tend to be authoritarian. Several factors have led media regulation in Indonesia to adopt varied paradigms, such as the weakening of civil society pressure, powerful oligarchs in the politics of media policy in Indonesia, and the strengthening of the pro-status quo group (especially the government) who wishes the government to act as a media regulator as in the New Order era. These factors influence the choice of paradigms adopted in developing media regulation in Indonesia.

jurnal iptek-kom (jurnal ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi komunikasi)/jurnal iptek-kom

Perbandingan Paradigma Otoritarianisme dan Demokrasi dalam Regulasi Media Massa di Indonesia (Comparing Authoritarianism and Democracy Paradigm in Mass Media Regulations in Indonesia)