English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Authorship and originality were tricky things in medieval literature and documents. They were written in a culture of imitation rather than originality. The Latin word auctoritas could mean both an author and their authority, usually both combined. Auctoritas had initially meant the quality by which a person can be trusted. Consequently, it came to mean the authoritative status of a person and further that of their writings.1 So, the ‘author’ was not just any writer whose texts were read, but the modern equivalent to their status would be something like that of Judith Butler in gender studies or Max Weber in sociology. Often, only writers meriting the status of auctoritas were explicitly cited, others

helsinki university press ebooks

Manuscripts, Qualitative Analysis and Features on Vectors: An Attempt for a Synthesis of Conventional and Computational Methods in the Attribution of Late Medieval Anti-Heretical Treatises