English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Drawing on reported cases this essay endeavors to assess the impact of admissibility rules, trial safeguards, changes to admissibility and procedural rules, and the emergence of exogenous scientific advice, on legal responses to latent fingerprint evidence. Focused on  reported  decisions in four common law jurisdictions, namely England and Wales, the United States, Canada and Australia, the essay examines the overwhelmingly accommodating response to this forensic science evidence.

Cuando el derecho es poco fiable: respuestas jurídicas a la prueba de huellas dactilares latentes