English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The aim this study was conducted was to test the s imilarity between the reliability of the Mile Run/Wa lk Test and One- and-a-Half Mile Run or Walk Test and the Pacer Test using criterion-reference and norm reference a s a working framework. Sample was administered using two attemp ts of the PACER test and one attempt of the Mile Run or Walk Test and One-and-a-Half Mile Run or Walk (minimum ag e = 13.5 + 0.5 years). Scores on level of maximum volume of oxygen consumption or cardiovascular fitness were ovia the Mile Run/Walk Test, One and a Half Mi le Run/Walk Test and the PACER Test. Analysis was done using the Pearson Product Moment correlation approa ch in order to determine the reliability of the Mile Run/W alk Test, One and a Half Mile Run/Walk Test and the P ACER Test. The estimated criterion referenced reliability for the Mile Run/Walk Test and the PACER Test were gaine d via the ‘proportion of agreement’ (Pa) and ‘modified kappa (Kq), using the FITNESSGRAM R Standards (Cooper Institute for Aerobics Research, 1992) (Baumgartner et al., 2003) and the One and a Half Mile Run/Walk Test was obtai ned by using the American College of Sports Standards (ACS M, 1999).

Criterion-Referenced and Norm-Referenced Agreement between the Mile Run/ Walk Test and the One-And-A-Half Mile Run/Walk Test and the Pacer Test