English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The focus of ethnobiological studies, their methods and the participation of local counterparts in these have changed substantially during the last decades. From the scientific point of view, ethnobotanical research has gone from simple inventories or lists of useful plants to detailed quantitative studies, backed by solid methods and analysis. However, one of the changes that stands out most is the incorporation of the guidelines set forth in the Nagoya Protocol, which has allowed this science to develop research in which the participation of local counterparts is much more active, going from being only the sources of information to be the main actors developing the investigations, and to be only mentioned in the acknowledgments to be authors of the publications that are the product of the investigation. All this process has been an apprenticeship, that I personally reflect in the process that my training as an ethnobotanist has followed.

Making friends in the field: How to become an ethnobotanist. - A personal reflection