English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Most design codes and specifications recommend a simple pseudo-static approach for the analysis of slope stability under seismic conditions. The codes in different countries appoint different pseudo-static seismic coefficient. The present work list different seismic coefficients in Russian, Chinese and European codes. A sensitivity analysis of a case slope was carried out using GeoStudio, then determined that the stability of the slope is more sensitive to material cohesion and seismic coefficient than material density and friction angle. It’s shown that the chosen of the seismic coefficient has a big effect on slope stability.

Comparison of Russian, Chinese and European seismic design on pseudo-static seismic coefficient in slope analysis