English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A study comparing the efficacy of nasal masks and prongs and adverse effect associated with them. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit of Burdwan Medical College in between January 2016 to June 2017. 352 newborns were taken and divided into two groupsA (received CPAP with prongs) and B (received CPAP with masks). Shapiro Wilk test, Chi square test, Student t test, Mann Whitney U test, Pearson’s product moment correlation and binary logistic regression were used. P<0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Mean age of study population was 29.5±3.2 weeks and mean birth weight was 1.417±0.214 kg. CPAP failure, duration of CPAP, duration of oxygen dependency, hospital stay and mortality were significantly less among mask group. Complications and nasal injury were higher among the prong group.

indian journal of scientific research

A Comparative Study Of Nasal Prongs And Facemasks For Providing Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Among Newborns Suffering From Respiratory Distress