English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The paper proposes an approach to the identification and elimination of conflicts of technical regulation parameters contained in the normative and technical documentation of the design and construction industry. The approach is based on comparing the complexity of the methods of defining the same parameters of technical regulation in various normative documents, followed by an analysis of the validity of only one of the studied methods. It is proposed to apply a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the associated parameters of technical regulation, which are involved in various investigated techniques and regulatory documents, in order to identify the depth of integration of one or another of them in the actual practice of design and construction work. If one or more of the techniques under consideration are less substantiated from a scientific, qualitative and/or quantitative point of view, then it (they) is (are) subject to withdrawal from the relevant normative documents with the provision of appropriate recommendations and references to that normative document, which is accepted as the main one for determining the investigated parameter of technical regulation. After removing unnecessary parameters (duplicated to optimization), all editable regulatory documents should be subjected to expert advice to supplement and provide guidance on the use of other existing normative documents related to the data when determining the specific parameter of technical regulation. In addition, expert opinion will help to avoid possible shortcomings in the narrative of normative documentation, as well as prevent the loss of some important part of descriptive information and simplified approaches to an approximate assessment of the investigated parameters of technical regulation, which can be used for integrated assessment calculations, the execution of project documentation at the stage of sketch design and pre-design works.

Some aspects of setting up the technical regulation system in the design and construction industry in the transition to a design parametric approach.