English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Aims & Objectives: To demonstrate, Angiodefender device, is comparable to “Brachial artery ultrasound imaging” (BAUI) in their abilities to quantify percentage flow mediated vasodilation (FMD) of the brachial artery. Methods: Study was conducted on 100 patients, flow mediated vasodilation was measured by BAUI as well as by the Angiodefender device and the results were compared. Results: The mean %FMD measured by the BAUI was found to be 7.46 ±  4.21 whereas mean %FMD measured by the Angiodefender was 8.24 ±  2.46, (p value 0.113). Positive correlation was found between both the tests with correlation coefficient of 0.65, p value < 0.0001 which is highly significant. Conclusion: Results obtained by both the methods were comparable there was no significant statistical difference. Positive correlation was highly significant between both the tests with correlation coefficient of 0.65. Keywords: Brachial artery ultrasound imaging, Angiodefender, Flow mediated vasodilation

ASSESSMENT OF FLOW MEDIATED DILATATION OF BRACHIAL ARTERY BY ANGIODEFENDER DEVICE AS COMPARED TO BRACHIAL ARTERY ULTRASOUND IMAGING.